Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Anna Parcerisas. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Anna Parcerisas. Mostrar todas las entradas

Behind my ivory shoes

domingo, 6 de julio de 2014

ANNA PARCERISAS

I will dream about a person tonight
I will see strange kisses
Behind my ivory shoes.
And I’ll feel as if my lips
were part of them.
Tonight I’ll see inner awareness,
Aloofness,
And deep humid distance
Behind my ivory shoes.
And as a sharp thorn of pain
Those kisses will block my eyes,
As you will be kissing her face,
Behind my ivory shoes.
Tonight I’ll be a spectator,
You’ll make me invisible,
And in this pristine distant bed
You’ll appear in my mind again,
Behind my ivory shoes.
Turning my lips carmine,
Blinding my eyes,
And tormenting my flesh
With a soft destruction.

© Anna Parcerisas Casanovas

"Nymphomaniac: Underneath an epic mess there is a great film desperate to get out"

lunes, 17 de marzo de 2014

ORIGINAL TITLE: Nymphomaniac
DIRECTOR: Lars von Trier
SCREEN WRITER: Lars von Trier
CAST: Charlotte Gainsbourg, Stellan Skarsgård, Stacy Martin, Shia LaBeouf, Connie Nielsen, Christian Slater, Nicolas Bro, Jesper Christensen, Uma Thurman, Caroline Goodall, Kate Ashfield, Saskia Reeves, Jens Albinus, Sophie Kennedy Clark, Mia Goth, Omar Shargawi, Severin von Hoensbroech
RUNNING TIME: 117 min.
RATING: 6.0/10

ANNA PARCERISAS

“Perhaps the only difference between me and other people is that I've always demanded more from the sunset. More spectacular colors when the sun hit the horizon. That's perhaps my only sin”.
Two afternoons ago I went to see Nymphomaniac at one of my favorite cinemas in London, Curzon Soho, between Piccadilly Circus and Leicester Square. I have to say that I was quite eager to see Trier’s last movie. I suppose it’s because of the comments and reviews I’ve read before deciding to watch the movie. I expected some sort of shocking and outstanding movie, but as far as I’m concerned it’s not all it’s cracked up to be. On top of that, if what you are expecting is a two-hour marathon porn movie, you’ll be disappointed as well.
In my opinion, Nymphomaniac volume 1 starts off very well. I have to admit that I was quite impressed by the first scene where we can see some detailed images of rain lashing down and a woman lying hurt in the middle of a narrow and dark street while “Führe mich” by Rammstein is playing. I think the contrast between silent scenes in the pouring rain and the sight of the the body of a woman lying in the street together with the creepy and strong theme of Rammstein’s song is pretty interesting. I would say that the music breaks and swallows up the silence that is supposed to take place in the scene. That can make the viewer think that the life of the woman lying in the street is broken by something.

The film follows Joe (Charlotte Gaisbourg) telling a tale all about her sordid sex life, to a virginal man (Stellan Skarsgard) who found her in a dark alley and took her to his his small flat. Each chapter covers one part of her tale, and tenuously links it with another theme: Fibonacci Numbers, fly-fishing, the human condition, among others.
With that said, I found the beginning of the film quite gripping but unfortunately this didn’t last long. As the movie progressed it turned out to be very off-putting. Especially when you reach Chapter 3, I was getting dead bored. This is the chapter that Uma Thurman appears in, and it doesn't work.. The humour, and there is a lot of humour in this Chapter, and throughout the film, seemed forced, to the point that people seemed to be laughing at the film, rather than with it.


As far as I’m concerned, the movie is well-known for its “high sexual and explicit material” (actually, it was forbidden in Turkey because of this) but honestly I think it is relatively restrained and is unlikely to shock you. Of course there are explicit sexual scenes, but they aren’t out of line. As Gainsbourg and Martin explained in a few interviews the sex scenes were unsimulated. To reach this, von Trier shot the actors pretending to have sex and then had the body doubles, who really did have sex. So above the waist it was the star and the below the waist were the doubles.
To sum up, I would describe Nymphomaniac as a tour that takes in a singular human experience, including the body and the mind, sex and love, art and life, and all of the complicated and interesting connections between them. For me, a film that goes nowhere, it’s like a good title for a book but you cannot read the pages. It doesn’t stand out in the
crowd, it’s one more movie that could have been a great one but sadly it’s hidden.
Trailer


Cinema review: "Martha Marcy May Marlene"

martes, 28 de enero de 2014

ORIGINAL TITLE: Martha Marcy May Marlene
DIRECTOR: Sean Durkin
PRODUCER: Fox Searchlight Pictures / BorderLine Films / FilmHaven Entertainment
SCREEN WRITER: Sean Durkin
CAST: Elizabeth Olsen, Brady Corbet, Hugh Dancy, John Hawkes, Sarah Paulson, Julia Garner, Louisa Krause, Christopher Abbott
RUNNING TIME: 102 minutes
VALORATION: 8.5/10



ANNA PARCERISAS 

I’m going to start my first post of my new blog introducing one of my favorite movies. 'Martha Marcy May Marlene' is what I call an extraordinary powerful psychological drama but, at the same time, it contains some aspects of the thrillers. This indie movie shows us the topic of the cults from an impartial point of view; in any scene of the movie the director postulates for and against the cults, what’s more, when any character uses the word cult, they refer to it by calling it “The Family”, which reminds us of Charles Manson’s cult. It arouse in California in the late 60's and soon Manson's notoriety spread rapidly throughout America and the rest of the world because of his numerous murders including pregnant Hollywood actress and Roman Polanski’s wife, Sharon Tate, who was brutally killed (16 times stabbed following a Satanic ritual) along with four others .    
The movie begins showing us a group of people, who they mention as “The Family”, living in some kind of a hippie hut. As soon as the film progresses, we can see that they all throw on some behaviors out of the normal - they only eat once a day and at a specific time, all the members of the group live under strict rules established by a leader who they accept, respect and consider these rules as something normal in their lives.
Among these members of “The Family” there is Martha (Elisabeth Olsen), a girl who escapes from the cult running into the woods in order to reach the city center. After that, she calls up her sister Lucy (Sarah Paulson), who she hadn’t talked to or even communicated with for the past two years.
Lucy lives in a house in front of a lake with her husband Ted (Hug Dancy). In there, they will try, especially Lucy, to get back all the time they hadn’t spent together.
Nevertheless, no sooner is Martha settled in her new home than she starts having a weird behavior - she mixes up reality with fiction; and her dreams, paranoia and a stream of stressing, mysterious, and out of line events is what keeps the spectator glued to the screen every single minute of the film.  In these scenes Martha is constantly haunted by flashbacks, which take the spectator back to her life and experiences in the commune. In these flashbacks we can see the cruel, tormenting and haunting process that the new members of “The Family”have to undergo, including rapes, hard work on the farm, orgies, a drastic change in their nutritional habits, etc. All controlled and managed by their charismatic leader - Patrick (John Hawkes).
In one of those days in the commune, Patrick sings a song to Martha which is called “She’s just a picture”. The song isn't a compliment to Martha at all, it's just another way to manipulate her. She thinks he's singing a sweet song about her when actually it's just about how empty he thinks she is. Once more we can link that aspect of Patrick spending time singing and playing the guitar in the commune to Charles Manson.
Anyway, the end of the film is one of those that leave the viewer with haunting images and moments of the movie for hours on end, not for what it shows, but what it doesn’t show, the unanswered questions. The first time I watched the movie I thought it was a kind of a joke or something and I just didn’t believe that the film had ended until I saw the credits rolling. So because of that I started to remember the amount of ongoing images watched and trying to find an acceptable ending for the film. Although the ending is excessively open, you can figure out that the car following Martha is Patrick's and two other members of the commune.
So the message of the film is clear: the cult may let you leave, but your mind will never leave the cult. 
The technical part is good too, it is based on showing reality and flashbacks which show up between dialogues and silences. Although I have to say that the movie is full of silences, they are very relevant throughout movie. They show us the character’s attitudes with simple stares and images that convey shocking scenes and important dialogues among the characters.
All the performances of the characters are in so many ways most impressive too, especially the young actress Elisabeth Olsen, who shows us the submission that a person that has been in a cult has to undergo, while hiding behind four different names (Martha Marcy May Marlene) that shows us her non-definition, insecurity and manipulation. Another interpretation that has to be said is the one from John Hawkes, showing us the power of the leader controlling all the members of the group as though they were toys.  
Martha Marcy May Marlene is one of these wonderful indie movies that are rare and underrated. This film is one of those that give the viewer plenty of food for thought.

"Daisies dies in winter"

viernes, 24 de enero de 2014


Extracto del guión del corto "Daisies died in Winter", escrito y dirigido ANNA PARCERISAS.



Scene I
(A song will be playing while Daisy is hanging clothes on a clothesline outside; Nalin is serving coffee and putting daisies in a vase. Suddenly Daisy goes to the garden in front of the house and lies there while reading a book. Nalin approaches her and they start a conversation).

Daisy: I feel like I’m trapped in a field of daisies, and I don’t know why my mind is burning with desire to cut off the daisies. I don’t know how I got there; I suppose that some things just can't be explained.  
Nalin: You should take your meds, Daisy, otherwise I’ll have to take you to the doctor again and believe me, I don’t want to.
Daisy: If I don’t get out of the field I’ll start cutting off daisies until all of them are lifeless.
Nalin: Take your meds or you’ll go nuts again, Daisy.
Daisy: I’m not nuts, Nalin, I just have the feeling of living in a dream within the realm of possibility. I’m just out there, in a field of daisies crying bitter tears and running away from my burning desire of cuttting off daisies. I’m out there with that jumble of feelings all the time.
Nalin: What if this field of daisies is just a nightmare you had where the border between fiction and reality is intermixed?
Daisy: Dreams and nightmares are a part of reality, Nalin. When do you think we’re going to die?
Nalin: Why are you asking me this kind of things? Nobody knows that, it can be tomorrow, next week, in five years’ time, we can’t know that for sure, Daisy.
Daisy: I wouldn’t be that sure.
Nalin: And why wouldn’t you be sure about that? Either you know it or you don't?
Daisy: I don’t know … it’s just that sometimes I think that since the moment that we  were born the date of our death is just set, like if life was a dream and as soon as you go to sleep someone knows when you’re going to wake up.
Nalin: And why would this be true?
Daisy: Well it happens to the daisies, we all know that they die in winter although they look wonderful in spring. It’s some kind of suicide because life avoids them. And then they become just like pictures.

Más sobre la autora aquí